The Nature of Leadership Style in Nursing Management Research Paper

The Nature of Leadership Style in Nursing Management - Research Paper Example The research article ‘The Nature of Leadership style in Nursing Management’ by John Azaare and Janet Gross addresses the problem of leadership among the nurse managers, and how their leadership styles affect nurses and general operations of the health facility setting. The authors have adequately defined the problem as addressed in the research paper. Therefore, the purpose of the study is adequately stated and defined as identifying the style of leadership adopted by nurse leaders, the effectiveness of such leadership styles, and evaluating how different nurses react to such leadership styles in healthcare settings, are taken into account. The study is significant to nursing; it highlights problems in the administration of healthcare facilities and sensitizes nurse managers to adopt effective leadership styles that are evidence-based, and avoid styles that may demoralize the staff leading to low productivity. The significance of the study is to identify the nurse leader ship styles in most developing nations such as Ghana, and how it affects the operations of healthcare facilities. The paradigm in use in the study is the naturalistic paradigm. In a naturalistic paradigm, there are a number of realities involved, which can only be studied holistically; they cannot be controlled, though a good level of understanding regarding these issues can be achieved. Similarly, in this research, there are a number of factors at play in determining the leadership styles of a nurse manager.... This approach increases the value of the study in that by connecting all the aspects of an inquiry in determining nurse managers’ leadership styles, and the effectiveness of such leadership in nursing, the researchers indirectly bring out a certain preferred approach to the idea of nurse leadership. Such preferred approach would be a managerial style that increases nurse motivation while promoting cooperation between the nurse and nurse manager. The theoretical framework which involves citing of previous researches is well integrated throughout the research. Using such a framework in the qualitative research allows the researchers to have some grounds through which they critically examine similar issues regarding nurse managers in different locations. Ethical Aspects The research adequately observed all the ethical requirements, and exhausted the necessary approval and permission from authorities before carrying out the research. Such included obtaining permission from the rel evant hospital authorities before carrying out the research, requesting the nurse to participate in the research willingly, well informed, and by not revealing the names of the respondents and the hospitals in which the research was carried out. However, the author did not take due diligence in protecting the nurses from harm. The research portrays the nurse leaders as harsh and people who use authority to suppress their subordinates. The nurses participating in the above research were outsourced from nursing units and wards in the two hospitals. All the respondents were directly under a nurse manager in these hospitals. Consequently, there were chances of such nurse being victimized by the nurse managers

Qualities Important in Becoming an Officer in the United States Army Essay Example for Free

Qualities Important in Becoming an Officer in the United States Army Essay I don’t believe anyone could argue that it takes a good amount of leadership in order to become a successful United States Military Academy cadet, as well as an officer in the United States Army. This is almost certainly one of the first things someone would look for in a strong officer. A strong leader can impact his soldiers in various ways. If your soldiers don’t stand behind you, and don’t have faith in you, they are more prone to disagree with or disobey your orders. Aside from leadership, a USMA cadet should be able to easily demonstrate confidence. What good is an officer who knows what must be done, but cannot effectively stand in front of his soldiers and tell them what needs to be done? As an officer in the Army, there will be numerous times where you will need to speak to groups of soldiers of varying sizes. Whether it’s something as simple as giving a safety brief, or something more important such as a mission briefing, you will need to have confidence in yourself in order to accomplish this. A USMA cadet should also have integrity, which happens to be one of the seven army values as well. I define integrity as doing the right thing, even when you think no one is watching. Lacking integrity in the civilian world is one thing, however in the military it is incredibly more dangerous as it could result in the death of fellow soldiers or even yourself. For example if you’re on guard for the night and decide that you would rather catch up on your sleep, you are endangering yourself along with all your battle buddies. A successful Army officer is also going to benefit from having a willingness to learn. Although West Point will have done it’s very best to prepare you for the duties of an officer, there is only so much you can learn from a classroom environment. While a brand new 2nd Lieutenant Platoon Leader may outrank a Sergeant First Class, there is still a vast amount of knowledge that the new Lieutenant can pick up from that E7. In my short time in the Army I have noticed that the young Lieutenants are almost always willing to take advice from their senior noncommissioned officers. Another important quality in an Army officer is bravery. Even if you are not serving in a combat MOS, you never know when you will be required to be brave You also need to have the courage to stand up for what you believe in, and for what you know to be right. Another quality that will keep your soldiers on your side is loyalty. If you can’t stay loyal to your soldiers, they will not have as much motivation to stay loyal to you. That also ties into the obvious loyalty to your country that is required of any military member. There are so many integral qualities and morals that are required of an officer in the Army. Unfortunately I am restricted with the length of this essay, but I have tried to highlight what I believe to be some of the most important values that should be deep inside all officers. Without values and morals your character will most likely be lacking and who would want to follow you at that point?

National Innovation System Concept

National Innovation System Concept In a globalising world, is there any value in the concept of a â€Å"National Innovation System†? INTRODUCTION The progressive advancements in the different scientific fields and their applications in technology have become one of the most important corner stones for any nation’s wealth and economic growth. For technology and scientific research to be successful in all aspects, including the organisation and the collaboration between the different players in each technological camp, different governments and public and private organizations reached the conclusion that a whole structure of communication and cooperation should be established in order to reach the desired successes in what concerns research, development and the technological objectives that are ultimately the driving force for any economy and societal well-being within a state. One of the most important problems facing the policy making process was the lack of information regarding specific fields and the lack of knowledge in other fields. The need to have a certain kind of a long and constructive relationship between scientists and the technology specialists, on one side, and the policy makers, on the other, became more evident in the twentieth century as technological advancements (in all industrial fields and in sectors related to information technology) grew in extremely high speeds and in extremely high amounts. A stable and continuous flow of information concerning the ongoing changes that were (and still are) taking place in the research and development arena had to be maintained. This gave birth to the concept of National Innovation Systems which, in theory, should be the solution to the above mentioned problem. The idea behind the concept that was evolving is thoroughly explained by Mytelka as she stated that The 1970s and 1980s marked the passage from an era in which technological change was mainly incremental. Time was available to either amortize heavy tangible and intangible investments in new products and processes, or to catch up with a slowly moving technological frontier by mastering processes of production and distribution for what were relatively stable products. Protected national environments were both a blessing and a curse in that earlier period, since they provided time and space for infant industries to emerge but frequently little incentive for them to become competitive whether at home or abroad. At the same time, within the markets of developing countries, high levels of protection created the potential for oligopolistic market behavior by large, mainly foreign firms, which raised prices to local consumers and made exporting difficult. (15) National Innovation Systems The concept of ‘National Innovation System’ appeared as a prospective response to the necessity of having clear policies that shape the work and the interconnectedness between research, organisations, industries and governments in regards to science and technology research and the products that are expected to be received from that research. An innovation system is the result of the processes of research and development in any science and technology related field. In this context, we can understand that the innovation system involves the distribution, or spreading, of the needed information and knowledge bases regarding a given technology between the various entities that require having them. This should cover the governmental organisations, the interested centres of research, the universities, the industries and even the individuals. The need to create innovation systems on national levels became important in the 1970s and the 1980s. This is explained by Nelson and Rosenberg as they state the following: The slowdown of growth since the early 1970s in all of the advanced industrial nations, the rise of Japan as a major economic and technological power, the relative decline of the United States, and widespread concerns in Europe about being behind both have led to a rash of writing and policy concerned with supporting the technical innovative prowess of national firms. At the same time, the enhanced technical sophistication of Korea, Taiwan, and other NICs (Newly Industrialized Countries) has broadened the range of nations whose firms are competitive players in fields that used to be the preserve of a few and has led other nations who today have a weak manufacturing sector to wonder how they might emulate the performance of the successful NICs. There clearly is a new spirit of what might be called technonationalism in the air, combining a strong belief that the technological capabilities of a nations firms are a key source of their competitive prowess, with a belief that these capabil ities are in a sense national, and can be built by national action. (Nelson 3) It is evident that the concept was originally created in order to give more advantageous steps to science and technology related entities in what concerns competitiveness and the ability to survive and grow both inside the borders of the country itself and as a strong product export bridge to other countries. The main objective in this regard is economical; each country is required to establish the most suitable environment for scientific research and technological structures to flourish and, by doing so, to strengthen the economy of the country and the living standards of its people. The National Research Council defines ‘National Innovation System’ by stating that it â€Å"refers to the collection of institutions and policies that affect the creation, development, commercialization, and adoption of new technologies within an economy† (105). Another definition is that â€Å"the National Innovation System is a systemic model that shows dynamic interactions and pattern of processes that facilitate technology flow in the system, incorporating variables and players from all directions that affect the innovation process† (Hulsink 16). It must be noted here that the above mentioned process should contain, within it, all the elements leading to influence the whole technological sector within a country and this is specifically why there should be clear policies and laws regulating the way in which the system should function and how it should present the required results. Factors leading to the creation of a successful national innovation system are presented by Biegelbauer and Borras: â€Å"A national innovation system is a whole set of factors influencing the development and utilisation of new knowledge and know-how†. The authors emphasise the fact that education is an important element in the process of creating and implementing the system in question (84). For a national innovation system to be structured correctly, a thorough and comprehensive analysis should be performed on a national scale; this is because the system should be able to determine which elements are needed for growth and which policies are the most adequate. â€Å"National profiles are too complex and diverse to derive a unified representation of the system, posing the problem of defining and modelling the NIS. One useful way to deal with heterogeneous profiles of NISs is a taxonomic approach where national systems are classified into several categories† such as â€Å"large high-income countries, smaller high-income countries, and lower-income countries† or â€Å"large/rich countries, small/rich countries, and developing countries† (Park, Y. and Park, G. 403-404). According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, there are different policy making problems in what concerns the operational side of the national innovation system. â€Å"In General, the attention of policy makers moved away from an overall priority to fund the RD input to the economy, with additions along the way to the market to enhance technology transfer† and a special care was given in what concerns encouraging the collaboration and the methods of networked work and â€Å"the flows of knowledge into spin-offs and industrial use, institutional change, entrepreneurship, and improved market oriented financial systems† (14-15). The document of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development also explains that policy makers should take important factors into consideration, such as the relations and inter-dependences between a variety of market sectors, such as labour, capital, and product markets because they are the source of innovation and growth. Another important factor is that policies should also cover sectors that are not considered as related to markets, this can include partnerships in research and development activities (16). The policies in what concerns the system in question, for it to be successful on a national level, should take into consideration a variety of elements and keep them under continuous scrutiny. These elements include the amount and the quality of the performed innovation, the continuous growth in manpower (for what concerns the technological production process) and in the population (in what concerns the use of the produce), the level of growth of the economy itself with all what comes with that concerning new challenges in regards to raw materials and the human factor, the ability of firms to move from one sector into the other, according to the changes in scientific and technological advancements, independently. This creates a huge amount of work for policy makers and scientists and technology experts alike in order to keep policies efficient and effective, on one hand, and in continuous evolution and change, on the other, according to the changes on the ground and according to the changes forced by outside factors. National Innovation Systems Globalisation As clear from the concept’s name itself, the most important point to note is that it was created, and originally thought of, around the concept of a limited political and geographic entity; the country. It focuses on the ‘national’ aspect of the economical, scientific and technological sectors. In today’s world, that is certainly different from that of the 1950s and the 1960s, many changes have occurred that transformed our lives because of the tremendous advancements in science and its direct applications in technology; this includes the way we make business, the way we create products and offer new services, the way the manufacturing processes of certain products take place, and the way information and knowledge are being distributed and reached. It is now more obvious than any point in time in the past that a national system in relation to science, technology, research and industry, no matter how policies are accurately prepared and implemented, cannot survive if the international (or the global) element is not taken into consideration and if it is not dealt with adequately. Much less agreement exists†¦ on how precisely globalization and innovation interact, and what this implies for industrial dynamics and a policy-oriented theory of innovation systems An important weakness of innovation system theory is a neglect of the international dimension. There is a tendency to define a NIS as a relatively closed system, even when dealing explicitly with the impact of globalization. A central proposition rests on dynamic agglomeration economies: interactive learning requires co-location, hence a preference for national linkages. (Ernst 1) Ernst illustrates his point of view around the most developed (and the most developing) sector of industry in the world today, which is information technology. He asserts that electronics equipment and components, software and information services, audio and video, and communication technologies (this includes e-commerce and web services) are all beyond the rigid understanding of the traditional national innovation system as was originally conceived by individuals, institutions, and governments. The changes that happened in the last 25 years have brought new problems for the concept of national innovation system. According to Mytelk, this is due to two main factors: â€Å"First, over the past two decades, production has become more knowledge intensive across a broad spectrum of industries from the shrimp and salmon fisheries in the Philippines and Chile, the forestry and flower enterprises in Kenya and Colombia, to the furniture, textile and clothing firms of Denmark, Taiwan and Thailand. Second, competition has both globalized and become more innovation-based† (15-16). It is, on the other hand, important to note that firms benefit from â€Å"sharing knowledge and reduce costs by jointly sourcing services and suppliers† This on-going process of knowledge exchange will always have a positive influence on all the procedures and results of the flow of information and knowledge and will create more opportunities for co-operation in research and developments experiences and projects. â€Å"Local training institutions and a sound infrastructure can provide further benefits for companies. Moreover, rivalry between firms can stimulate competitiveness. To note also that life quality and other non economic factors can be just as important in determining growth† (Carrin et al. 24). It is necessary for the innovation systems to evolve according to the evolution of the various elements that shape research and technology today. For the concept of innovation system to survive with success, new factors should be introduced within its structure in order to enable it to keep its competitiveness and growth, keeping in mind that this should be done in a way that turns the changes that occurred because of globalization into advantages, not disadvantages. Ernst draws our attention to the bright side, stating that â€Å"globalization enhances the dispersion of knowledge across firm boundaries and national borders. Such dispersion however has remained concentrated, due to the continuous impact of agglomeration economies† (30). CONCLUSION The idea behind the concept of national innovation system, just as anything other theory or structure, should evolve†¦ And this is exactly what happened. Scientific research, technological endeavours, and industrial successes do not depend on the organisation of institutions and on the flow of information within the national boundary alone, they interact with realities created and introduced by a newly shaping world with no borders and no geopolitical boundaries. The policies that deal with the flow and exchange of information and knowledge should deal with international effects and beyond-the-borders factors that can, and will, ultimately influence the national realities. Since the time of the concept’s first presentation by Freeman (1987) and Dosi et al (1988), many changes took place in what concerns the analysis and the policies regarding its methods and implementation; this is due to the enormous changes that happened in the various scientific and technological fields. The concept of national innovation system is a precious tool that should not be dropped because of globalisation; instead, it should be reshaped to cover the elements that did not exist previously. It should encourage the collaboration and the continuous flow and distribution of information and knowledge within the country itself, and then within the regional and international space. NIS should be re-developed to cover national, regional, and multi-national corporational level. Works Cited Mytelka, Lynn K. â€Å"Local Systems of Innovation in a Globalized World Economy.† Industry and Innovation, 7.1 (2000): 15-32. Park, Yongtae and Gwangman Park. When does a national innovation system start to exhibit systemic behavior? Industry and Innovation 10.4 (2003): 403 414. Nelson, Richard and Nathan Rosenberg. Technical Innovation and National Systems. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Ed. Richard Nelson. New York, U.S.A.: Oxford University Press, 1993 3. National Research Council. Harnessing Science and Technology for Americas Economic Future. Washington, D.C. U.S.A.: National Academy Press, 1999. Biegelbauer, Peter and Susana Borras. Innovation Policies in Europe and the Us: The New Agenda Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2003. Hulsink, Willem. Regional Clusters in ICT. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom Publishers, 2002. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Dynamising National Innovation Systems. France: OECD Publications, 2002. Ernst, Dieter. How globalization reshapes the geography of innovation systems. 24 May 1999. 06 September 2006. http://geein.fclar.unesp.br/reunioes/quinta/arquivos/140306_Ernst_99_globalization_1_.p df>. Carrin, Bart, et al. Science-Technology-Industry Network. September 2004. 07 September 2006. .

a state of mind :: essays research papers

SHIT? It is a whole state of mind... Rà ©flechissez when you go to the john, you say itself... "Ah!!Je naturally t'en will shit a whore of large shit, Ca will shit of the bubbles!!!" BUT only same Etes you conscious of the existence of your own shit, fruit of your entrails... Jako Boeuf said, I cite:"Tout man equipped with an anus of surcoit conscious of its existence cannot be conceived without the Shit." By this Quotation Jako Ox, proves to us that the shit exists, moreover it lives in symbiosis with its genitor: The man!!! This is the indubitable proof that the shit as bulky as it is! as puante as it soit!Que this shit exists beautiful and well in this world without pity... To return from there to the primary thought, the man who wants to shit, aprà ©s to be certain à ©xistence of its shit, does it have to wonder whether its shit is as large as it thinks it??? For that the man must unceasingly compare this divine feeling with those which it tested before, which it amene forcing, inevitably with the conclusion scatologique:Toute shit is relative in the face. an experimental method of calibration of the shit at summer developed by Jean-Phillipe Ball, disciple of famous Jako Ox... D=((Vh) ²*P)/S D:diametre of the merde(en m) Vh:Vitesse of race towards the chiottes(en m/s) P:Poid of homme(en N) S:Superficie of the chiottes(en m ²) It is thus, which we learn that the larger the john is, the more the shits are small in diameter, which explains why people having a large surface of john, shit more per quantity of absorptive food than the other individuals. Exemple:L a quiche shits a shit approximately 5.7 cm in diameter for an average length of 2m04.cf Pastis house A recent Study with also allowed our laboratory of aproximer the length of a Shit. L=(Ãâ€"t*q)/t+a L: length of the shit T: time since the last repas(en hour) Q: quantity of aerated beverage absorbà ©e(en L) T: Coefficient of contraction of rectum a: Age of the SDF of the corner of the street (in second) a 3 ° proprietà © of the shit can be calculated: Its I.G.M (Gustatory Index Merdique), also called Scale of Ball. This index of quality to the consumer to control the quality of its excrements.Plus the index is elevà ©, plus quality is good. This index is measured with Burne paper?, this paper, into contact of the shit changes color according to the hygiene of this one.

Animal Testing: Not Very Reliable or Safe for Human Safety

Animal Testing Nowadays there are many companies that test their products on animals such as makeup and painkillers. Not many people pay attention to this fact, but in actuality they should. Excuses for companies using animals for testing are that they have similarities in their tissues and DNA. Though parts of the human body vs. an animal’s body may have similarities but people must keep in mind that we are two totally different species. Science shows that animals rarely serve as good models for the human body so why would we feel safe with the product anyways.The best thing for us to do is test out products on other humans so then we can get reliable and accurate results. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal testing fail in human trials; from this information you can see that testing on animals isn't very reliable or safe for our safety and health. Also, it was said in multiple science journals that testing on animals would be a waste of time and life, both human and animal. Testing on animals is dangerous for both species.Other than the lack of similarities between the two, animal testing could lead to the spread of disease. For example, say my company is testing a new allergenic pill in chickens but it goes terribly wrong s d ills the animals, now I must find a way to dispose of them and if it’s not done properly, and someone gets their hands on the one of the tested animals and tries to eat it there's a high possibility that the consumer will become ill as well and end up spreading their illness to surrounding people, causing an outbreak. This could all be prevented if animal testing were to be banned. Thankfully, as of right now this has yet to happen, YET.Once again, we shouldn't test our products on animals because animals are helpless and have no say in the matter. With humans, we are able to voice our opinion and position on a subject so if we are Bering ask ed of something that we aren't comfortable participating in, then we don't have to, on the other hand; an animal cannot in any means voice their opinion to a human. If they don't wish to partake in these trials how would we have any way of knowing? More on, if you are I keep forcing these animals to participate in these tests this will make the animal vicious and dangerous leading on to having to ‘put down' the animal.If you keep abusing a species like this over time, you will be seen as a threat and that will be taught to the offspring, so in and so forth. If that were to happen we shouldn't even hope to get close to that animal anymore, they are traumatizing these species. Furthermore, animal testing is absolutely pointless because it is taking up entirely too much if the government’s money. We, as a hole, ate already in debt to chins at 1. 16 trillion dollars, but we choose to continue paying just about 200billion dollars in a yearly basis to animal testing just fit cancer alone.

French Pronunciation of the Letter H

French Pronunciation of the Letter H The letter H is always silent in French. However, there are two different kinds of Hs: H  muet and H  aspirà ©. The type of H at the beginning of the word lets you know whether to make contractions and pronounce liaisons with that word. To find out whether the H in a particular word is muet or aspirà ©, check a good French dictionary. There will be an asterisk or some other symbol to distinguish the two kinds of Hs. French Words With H Click these links to hear the words pronounced in French:homme  Ã‚  Ã‚  (man)hockey  Ã‚  Ã‚  (hockey)haut  Ã‚  Ã‚  (high)hà ´tel  Ã‚  Ã‚  (hotel)hiver  Ã‚  Ã‚  (winter) Letter Combinations With H (Click for Detailed Lessons) CH H Muet Most French Hs are mute - that is, they are not pronounced and the word acts as if it begins with a vowel. This means that  contractions  and  liaisons  are required. For example,  le   homme  contracts to  lhomme  - you cant say  le  homme.  And  les  hommes  is pronounced with a liaison: [lay zuhm].Here are the most common French words that begin with  H  muet. For nouns, the gender is provided (in parentheses):habile  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  skillfulhabilità ©Ã‚  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  fitnesshabiller  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to dresshabits  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  clotheshabiter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to live inhabitude  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  habithacker  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hackerHadà ¨s  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hadeshadj  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hajjhadron  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hadronhagard  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  distraughtHaà ¯ti  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Haitihaleine  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  breathHalloween  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Halloweenhalluciner  Ã ‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to hallucinatehalo-  Ã‚  (prefix)harmonica  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  harmonicaharmonie  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  harmonyharpagon  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  skinflint, ScroogeHawaà ¯Ã‚  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hawaiihebdomadaire  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  weeklyhà ©bergement  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  lodginghà ©berger  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to househà ©bà ©ter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to daze, stupefyhà ©breu  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hebrewhectare  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hectarehectique  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hectichà ©donisme  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hedonismhà ©gà ©monie  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hegemonyhà ©licoptà ¨re  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  helicopterhà ©lium  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  heliumhà ©lix  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  helixHelsinki  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Helsinkihà ©matome  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hematomahà ©misphà ¨re  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hemispherehà ©mophile  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hemophiliachà ©morragie  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hemorrhagehà ©morroà ¯de  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hemorrhoidhà ©patite   Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hepatitisherbage  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  pastureherbe  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  grasshà ©rà ©dità ©Ã‚  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  heredityhà ©riter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to inherithà ©roà ¯ne  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  heroin,  heroineherpà ¨s  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  herpeshà ©siter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to hesitatehà ©tà ©rosexuel  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  heterosexuelheure  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hourheureux  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  happyhexagone  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hexagonhiberner  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hibernatehibiscus  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hibiscushier  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  yesterdayhilare  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  beamingHimalaya  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  the Himalayashindou  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hinduhip-hop  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hip-hophippodrome  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  racetrackhippopotame  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hippopotamushirondelle  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  swallowhirsute  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hairy, shaggyhistoire  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  story, historyhiver  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  winterholo-  Ã‚  (prefix)hologramme  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hologramhomà ©opathie  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  homeopathyhomicide  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  homicidehommage  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  tributehomme  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  manhomo-  Ã‚  (prefix)honnà ªte  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  honesthonneur  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  honorhonorer  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to honorhà ´pital  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hospitalhoraire  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  schedule, timetablehorizon  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  horizonhorloge  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  clockhormone  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hormonehoroscope  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  horoscopehorreur  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  horrorhorrible  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  horriblehorrifier  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to horrifyhorticulture  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  horticulturehospitalità ©Ã‚  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hospitalityhostile  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hostilehà ´te  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hosthuile  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  oilhuà ®tre  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  oysterhumain  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  humanhumble  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  humblehumeur  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  moodhumide  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  humidhyacinthe  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hyacinthhybride  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hybridhydr-  Ã‚  (prefix)hydraulique  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hydraulichydrogà ¨ne  Ã‚  (m)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hydrogenhygià ¨ne  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hygienehyper-  Ã‚  (prefix)hypo-  Ã‚  (prefix)hystà ©rie  Ã‚  (f)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hysteria H Aspirà © Hs in French words borrowed from other languages are usually aspirate. Though the  H aspirà ©Ã‚  is not pronounced, it acts like a consonant; that is,  contractions  are not permitted with it and  liaisons  are not made in front of it. For example,  le hockey  does not contract to  lhockey  but remains  le hockey. And  les  hà ©ros  (the heroes) is pronounced [lay ay ro]. If you were to pronounce this with a liaison, [lay  zay  ro], you would be saying  les  zà ©ros  (the zeros).Here are the most  common French words  that begin with  H aspirà ©.hà ¢bleur  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  boasterla  hache  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  axehacher  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to chople  hachisch  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hashishle haddock  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  haddockla  haie  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hedgele haà ¯ku  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  haikule  haillon  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  ragla  haine  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hatredhaà ¯r  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to hatehaà ¯ssable  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  detestablehalal  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  halalle hà ¢le  Ã ‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  suntanhaleter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to pantle hall  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hallla  halle  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  marketle hallier  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  thicket, brushle halo  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  halola  halte  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  breakle  hamac  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hammockle hamburger  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hamburgerle  hameau  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hamletle hammam  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hammamla  hampe  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  polele hamster  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hamsterla  hanche  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hiple hand-ball  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  handballle handicap  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  handicaple hangar  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  shedhanter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to haunthapper  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to snatch, grabharangue  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  harangueharasser  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to exhaustharceler  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to harassla  harde  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  herdharder  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to leashhardi  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  daringle  hareng  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  herringla  hargne  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  spiteful angerle haricot  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  beanharnacher  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to harnessle  harpail  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  herdla  harpe  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  harp le  harpon  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  harpoonle  hasard  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  luck, chancela hà ¢te  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hastehà ¢ter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to hastenhaut  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  highla hauteur  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  heightle  havre  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  havenhercher  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to haulle hà ¨re  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  wretch,  young  stagle hà ©risson  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hedgehogla  hernie  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  herniale hà ©ron  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  heronle hà ©ros  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  herola herse  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hearse, harrowle hà ªtre  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  beech treeheurter  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to strikele hiatus  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hiatusle  hibou  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  owlle hic  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  snagle hickory  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hickoryhideux  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hideousla hià ©rarchie  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hierarchyle hià ©roglyphe  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hieroglyphehippie  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hippiehisser  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to hoist, heave, haulle hobby  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hobbyhocher  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to nodle hockey  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hockeyla Hollande  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hollandle  homard  Ã‚  Ã ‚  Ã‚  lobsterHong-Kong  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hong Kongla Hongrie  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hungaryla  honte  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  shamele  hoquet  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hiccuphors  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  outsidela  houe  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hoela  houille  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  coalla  houle  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  swellhouleux  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  stormyle hooligan  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hooliganla  houppe  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  tufthouspiller  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to scoldla  housse  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  coverhousser  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to coverle  houx  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  hollyle  hublot  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  portholela  huche  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  chest, trunkhuer  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to boole  huguenot  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Huguenothuit  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  eighthululer  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to hoothumer  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to smellhurler  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  to shriek